Cases 61 - 70 of 852
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Arnous v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Manar Arnous
Defendant:
Attorney General US Merrick B. Garland, UR M. Jaddou, Secretary of DHS ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Aliens: Refusal of Citizenship
Salilign v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Tesfaye Mulugeta Salilign
Defendant:
Secretary of DHS ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. Jaddou, Attorney General US Merrick B. Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447 Aliens: Refusal of Citizenship
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
POP v. MAYORKAS et al
as 2:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Dan A Pop
Defendant:
Secretary of DHS Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur M Jaddou and Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
