Cases 61 - 70 of 183
Davis v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2019cv02547
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Seth Davis
Not Yet Classified:
ADR Provider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gottfried v. BackChina, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv03548
Plaintiff:
Seth Gottfried
Defendant:
DOES 1 through 10 inclusive and BackChina, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Cole v. Southern Tool Inspection, LLC
as 4:2019cv03259
Defendant:
Southern Tool Inspection, LLC
Plaintiff:
Seth Cole
Hannah v. Thompson et al
as 4:2019cv02659
Defendant:
Mr. Terry Donohue, Mr. Edward Treinen, Rhonda J Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
Robbye Rena Hannah
Interested Party:
Seth A Schmeeckle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company v. Womack-Rodriguez, et al
as 5:2019cv00814
Defendant:
James G. Murray, Jr., Sara Jo Womack-Rodriguez, Trenton Seth Womack and others
Plaintiff:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Blackwell et al v. Lilis Energy, Inc.
as 4:2019cv02311
Plaintiff:
Brennan Short and Seth Blackwell
Defendant:
Lilis Energy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pate v. Johnson et al
as 3:2019cv00735
Defendant:
Kimberly Priest, David Keith Willeford and Seth Kretzer
Plaintiff:
Frank Edwin Pate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00173
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Kaplan v. Holmes et al
as 3:2019cv00444
Defendant:
Lawrence Angelilli, Ganesh B Rao, Michael P Rafferty and others
Plaintiff:
Angelo Kaplan
In re MoneyGram International Inc Derivative Litigation
as 3:2019cv00415
Defendant:
Lawrence Angelilli, Pamela H Patsley, Michael P Rafferty and others
Plaintiff:
Khon Meng Chew
In Re:
MoneyGram International Inc Derivative Litigation
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Angelo Kaplan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
