Cases 61 - 70 of 110
Baxter v. Harris et al
as 3:2015cv00019
Plaintiff:
Alexander L. Baxter
Defendant:
Spencer R. Harris, Brad Bracey and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Easting v. USA
as 1:2014cv00255
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Spencer T Easting
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Swift v. Western Mental Health Institute et al
as 1:2014cv01195
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Swift
Defendant:
Western Mental Health Institute, Haywood County Justice Complex, D. Nathaniel Spencer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Storey v. Schofield et al
as 1:2014cv01098
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Storey
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Jason Woodall, Bruce Westbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. Champaco et al
as 3:2013cv01444
Plaintiff:
Tyree Smith, Marcus Wright, Charles Nelson and others
Defendant:
J. Champaco, T. Perkins, F. Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thurman et al v. Greens, Beans and Taters et al
as 1:2013cv01309
Plaintiff:
Tabitha Thurman , Matthew McQueen , Christian Byrd and others
Defendant:
Greens, Beans and Taters , S O L, LLC , Besso's, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Banks v. Donahue et al
as 1:2013cv01299
Plaintiff:
Earnest J. Banks
Defendant:
Michael Donahue, Mitch Bradshaw, Tennessee Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mullins v. Moore et al
as 3:2013cv00585
Plaintiff:
John Robert Mullins, III
Defendant:
Spencer Derrell Moore, Patricia Ann Parry and Jason Lee Emmette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arnold v. First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
as 3:2013cv00810
Plaintiff:
Spencer Arnold
Defendant:
First National Collection Bureau, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Spencer
as 2:2013cv02608
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Yvonne Marie Spencer
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
