Cases 61 - 70 of 99
Hill v. State Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2013cv04276
Plaintiff:
Robert Hill
Defendant:
State Board of Pardons and Paroles, James E. Donald, Albert R. Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Georgia State Board of Pardons And Paroles et al
as 1:2013cv01863
Plaintiff:
Gerald Wayne Mathis
Defendant:
Georgia State Board of Pardons And Paroles and James Donald
NELMS v. STATE BOARD OF PARDON AND PAROLE et al
as 5:2013cv00167
Plaintiff:
JOHN NELMS
Defendant:
STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES and THURMAN L HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. State Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 1:2012cv03745
Plaintiff:
Roland Paul Hamilton
Defendant:
State Board of Pardons and Paroles
GEORGE v. Olens
as 1:2012cv00001
Petitioner:
TERRIVEO GEORGE
Respondent:
Sam Olens, Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles and GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bell v. State Board of Pardons and Parole, State of Georgia
as 1:2011cv03919
Plaintiff:
Levon Victor Bell
Defendant:
State Board of Pardons and Parole, State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. JACKSON COUNTY PRISON et al
as 3:2011cv00165
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEROY DAVIS
Defendant:
JACKSON COUNTY PRISON, Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles, Supreme Court of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doye v. State Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2011cv03370
Petitioner:
Noel R. Doye
Respondent:
State Board of Pardons and Paroles, Barry Goodrich and W. C. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Banks v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2011cv02135
Petitioner:
Leroy Banks
Respondent:
State of Georgia and Georgia State Board of Pardons And Paroles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Terry v. State Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2011cv01606
Petitioner:
Joseph Terry
Respondent:
State Board of Pardons and Paroles and W. C. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
