Cases filed in New Jersey
Cases 61 - 70 of 70
STIMMA et al v. TORRENT PHARMA, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv14318
Defendant: Quality Food Centers, Inc., HETERO USA INC., WAL-MART STORES, INC. and others
Plaintiff: Jynona Gail Lee, Margoth Strand and Dominic Stimma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALGREEN CO. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al
as 3:2012cv04115
Plaintiff: WALGREEN CO. , THE KROGER CO. , SAFEWAY INC. and others
Defendant: PFIZER INC., PFIZER IRELAND PHARMACEUTICALS, WARNER-LAMBERT COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
BURLINGTON DRUG CO., INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv02389
Plaintiff: A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, AMERICAN SALES COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant: CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS SERVICE, CVS Caremark Corporation, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Petitioner: MATRIX LABORATORIES LIMITED, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and MATRIX LABORATORIES INC.
Special Master: JOSE L. LINARES
In Re: LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court: FAITH HOCHBERG
Intervenor: MYLAN INC.
Interested Party: CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
WALGREEN CO. et al v. WYETH, INC. et al
as 3:2011cv06985
Plaintiff: WALGREEN CO. , THE KROGER CO. , SAFEWAY INC. and others
Defendant: WYETH, INC. and TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC. v. WYETH, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv05479
Defendant: WYETH LLC, WYETH, INC., WYETH PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Not Yet Classified: HEB GROCERY COMPANY LP, RITE AID CORPORATION, PAINTERS DISTRICT COUNCIL NO. 30 HEALTH & WELFARE FUND and others
Not Classified By Court: FAITH HOCHBERG
In Re: EFFEXOR XR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Special Master: JONATHAN J. LERNER
Interested Party: IBEW -- NECA Local 505 Health & Welfare Plan, MC -- UA Local 119 Health & Welfare Plan, CADILA HEALTHCARE LIMITED and others
Plaintiff: Individual Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs and PROFESSIONAL DRUG COMPANY, INC.
Petitioner: TIMMY P. THIEN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
WALGREEN CO. et al V. PFIZER INC. et al
as 2:2011cv02004
Plaintiff: WALGREEN CO. , THE KROGER CO. , SAFEWAY INC. and others
Defendant: PFIZER INC. and WARNER-LAMBERT CO.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
HIP HEALTH PLAN OF F, et al v. SCHERING-PLOUGH, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2001cv01652
Plaintiff: HIP HEALTH PLAN OF FLORIDA, INC. , Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs and Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs
Consol_plaintiff: AMY REICHERT , GREAT LAKES HEALTH PLAN, INC. , ROSEEN and others
Pecial_master: STEPHEN M. ORLOFSKY
Defendant: SCHERING-PLOUGH CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
HART et al v. MENU FOODS INCOME FUND et al Featured Case
as 1:2007cv04063
Plaintiff: JENNIFER HART, JENNIFER HART, SHEILA R. WASHINGTON and others
Defendant: MENU FOODS INCOME FUND, MENU FOODS INCOME FUND, MENU FOODS MIDWEST CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FORD et al v. MENU FOODS INCOME FUND et al Featured Case
as 1:2007cv03669
Plaintiff: HAYLEY FORD and SHANNON J. KRAMER
Defendant: MENU FOODS INCOME FUND, MENU FOODS MIDWEST CORPORATION, MENU FOODS SOUTH DAKOTA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
IN RE: PET FOOD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv02867
Defendant: CHENANGO VALLEY PET FOODS, MENU FOODS OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, ROYAL CANIN and others
Plaintiff: TERESA EILERS, PATRICIA KAY, NICK JACKSON and others
Interested Party: DONALD RICHARDSON
Not Classified By Court: DUSTIN TURNER, Daniel Kaffer, Margaret Picus and others
Petitioner: PAUL N PAQUETTE and AVA PAQUETTE
In Re: PET FOOD PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?