Cases 61 - 70 of 93
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv04297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02323
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00051
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
HUSSAIN et al v. MUKASEY et al
as 2:2008cv06299
Plaintiff:
ALTAF HUSSAIN, KASHAF ALTAF, FAISAL ALTAF and others
Defendant:
MICHAEL MUKASEY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, THE UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES ("USCIS") and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv04393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
EID et al v. THOMPSON et al
as 2:2008cv03996
Plaintiff:
ELIAS EID and GWEN PACKARD-EID
Defendant:
JOHN THOMPSON and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv04151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv03543
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
LIN v. UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT et al
as 2:2008cv02606
Petitioner:
TI ZENG LIN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION & CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, MICHAEL MUKASEY and UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
