Cases 61 - 70 of 8,337
Dancy v. USA
as 0:2023cv03685
Petitioner:
Nicholas Antwain Dancy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Foster v. EssilorLuxottica S.A. et al
as 0:2023cv03662
Plaintiff:
Tara Foster
Defendant:
EssilorLuxottica S.A., Luxottica Group S.p.A., Essilor International SAS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Conagra Brands, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv03549
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, Cargill Inc, Cargill Protein and others
Plaintiff:
Conagra Brands, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv03617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Compass Group USA, Inc. v. Cargill, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv03550
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation, Cargill Inc, Cargill Protein and others
Plaintiff:
Compass Group USA, Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Chauvin v. USA
as 0:2023cv03512
Petitioner:
Derek Michael Chauvin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Quirch Foods, LLC., et al v.Cargill, Inc., et al
as 0:2023cv03260
Plaintiff:
Quirch Foods, LLC., Butts Foods, LP, Quirch Louisiana LLC and others
Defendant:
Cargill Meat Solutions Corporations, Cargill Inc, Cargill Protein and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Hunter v. USA
as 0:2023cv03323
Petitioner:
Paris La Monte Hunter
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Welch v. USA
as 0:2023cv03326
Petitioner:
Chris Maurice Welch
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Sharma v. USA
as 0:2023cv03211
Petitioner:
Aditya Raj Sharma
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
