Cases 61 - 70 of 84
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
GAMMINO v. SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv07502
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. GAMMINO
Defendant:
SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION, SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P., SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
TIVO, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC, ET AL.
as 2:2011mc00201
Plaintiff:
TIVO, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC, ET AL.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv01664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv05387
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
BARNARD et al v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv01304
Plaintiff:
TALBOTT BARNARD , DONALD B. BIGGERSTAFF , SUSAN BIGGERSTAFF and others
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
DOWNING v. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00267
Plaintiff:
JANET DOWNING
Defendant:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC., THE VERIZON EMPLOYEE BENEFITS COMMITTEE and METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00859
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act 1993 (FMLA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00744
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.