Cases 61 - 70 of 473
FICHETOLA v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 1:2020cv04423
Plaintiff:
Amanda Fichetola
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BEMAH v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv03224
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-10, ABC CORPORATION 1-10 and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Plaintiff:
WILLIE BEMAH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PETTEWAY v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv02713
Defendant:
XYZ CORP., (said names being fictitious), ABC, INC., WAL-MART STORES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
KAREN PETTEWAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
ARDILES v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.
as 3:2020cv03249
Defendant:
ABC CORP. 1-10, JOHN DOE 1-10 and WAL-MART STORES, INC.
Plaintiff:
GIANNA A. ARDILES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
AUTULLO v. WAL-MART STORES INC et al
as 3:2020cv01981
Defendant:
XYZ CORPORATION 1-10, WAL-MART STORES INC, JOHN DOE 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
DAWN AUTULLO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JACINTO v. WALMART et al
as 2:2020cv02550
Defendant:
DEF MAINTENANCE COMPANY, JOHN DOES 1-10, URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES and others
Plaintiff:
MARIA JACINTO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JACINTO v. WALMART et al
as 3:2020cv02550
Defendant:
DEF MAINTENANCE COMPANY, JOHN DOES 1-10, URBAN EDGE PROPERTIES and others
Plaintiff:
MARIA JACINTO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STARLING v. WAL-MART STORES, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv01595
Defendant:
ABC CORP. 1-10, WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
COLLEEN STARLING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PARK et al v. SAM'S EAST, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv21597
Defendant:
SAM'S WEST, INC., Sam's Club, Store #4722, WALMART, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT PARK and Kathleen Park
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
