Cases 61 - 70 of 155
Walker v. Peters et al
as 2:2017cv01373
ODOC/SRCI:
All John Does/Jane Does
Defendant:
All ODOC Agents and All SRCI Agents, All SRCI Health Care RNs, Kim Brockamp and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lee Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Ives et al
as 3:2017cv01218
Defendant:
4B Unit Team, Prior Warden Feather, FCI Sheridan's Warden Ives and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Che Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00806
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lee v. FCI Sheridan Warden et al
as 3:2017cv00458
Defendant:
FCI Sheridan Warden and Staff and Inmates
Plaintiff:
Brandon Che Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. FCI Sheridan Warden et al
as 3:2017cv00429
Defendant:
FCI Sheridan Warden and Staff and Inmates
Plaintiff:
Brandon Che Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. FCI Sheridan Warden et al
as 3:2017cv00403
Defendant:
FCI Sheridan Warden and Staff and Inmates
Plaintiff:
Brandon Che Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vasquez v. Ives et al
as 3:2016cv02335
Defendant:
Warden Ives and Sheridan FCI
Plaintiff:
Mauricio Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Feather et al
as 3:2016cv02024
Defendant:
Administrator of the kitchen, Warden Feather, Recreation Supervisor Gogers and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Che Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Premo
as 6:2016cv00841
Petitioner:
Martin Allen Johnson
Respondent:
Warden Premo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus - Stay of Execution
Lee v. Ives et al
as 3:2016cv00816
Defendant:
Ball, Warden Ives, Keller and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Che Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
