Cases 61 - 70 of 1,261
WHITE v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
RENEE LYNN WHITE
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
STEPHENS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00661
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA S. STEPHENS
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Smith v. Christenson Copeland et al
as 2:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Jerry A Smith and Jerry Antwon Smith
Defendant:
J Christenson Copeland, M Wala, Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Christenson Copeland et al
as 3:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Jerry A Smith and Jerry Antwon Smith
Defendant:
J Christenson Copeland, M Wala, Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
William Caldwell
Defendant:
Com'r of Soc. S Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
MILLER v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00645
Plaintiff:
OUIDA NAKIA MILLER
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
GREER v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
DONALD C. GREER
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Campbell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Karen S. Campbell
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley and Commissioner of Social Security
Not Yet Classified:
General Counsel SSA (Court use only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
HUNTER v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
GRACE V. HUNTER
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
MONTGOMERY v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
CATHY L. MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
