Cases 61 - 70 of 87
ABDEL-AZIZ v. BOND et al
as 1:2016cv04817
Plaintiff:
BILAL ABDEL-AZIZ
Defendant:
WILLIE BOND, MARK ROMANO, MACK SELBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TOLBERT v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2016cv04165
Petitioner:
MARK TOLBERT
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WILLIE BONDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ABDEL-AZIZ v. BONDS et al
as 1:2016cv03600
Petitioner:
BILAL ABDEL-AZIZ
Respondent:
WILLIE BONDS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ALEXANDER v. BOND et al
as 2:2016cv01903
Petitioner:
SHADEE ALEXANDER
Respondent:
WILLIE BOND and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NIBLACK v. MIGLIO et al
as 2:2016cv00747
Plaintiff:
STANLEY L. NIBLACK
Defendant:
ANNA MIGLIO, CHRISTY RALPH, JAMES MCDONNELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MITCHELL v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 2:2016cv00532
Petitioner:
NAEEM MITCHELL
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF STATE OF NEW JERSEY and WILLIE BONDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WILLIAMS v. BONDS
as 1:2016cv00369
Petitioner:
MAURICE WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WILLIE BONDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SALESKY v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2015cv08221
Petitioner:
LEONARD SALESKY
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY and WILLIE BONDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Bonds v. Commissioner, Alabama Departme
as 15-14989
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES WILLIS BONDS
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
SMITH v. BONDS et al
as 2:2015cv07069
Petitioner:
JAMES LEE SMITH
Respondent:
WILLIE BONDS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
