Cases 61 - 70 of 120
Siever v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04223
Plaintiff:
Brad Siever
Defendant:
James Dimas, Anderson Freeman, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Halbrook v. Dimas et al
as 4:2017cv04197
Plaintiff:
Michael Halbrook
Defendant:
James Dimas, Anderson Freeman, Sharon Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conway v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2017cv00393
Plaintiff:
Gregory Conway
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Wexford Health Service. Inc., Paul Lewis Shicker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lymon v. Wexford Health Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv50093
Plaintiff:
Anthony C. Lymon
Defendant:
Wexford Health Service, Inc., Timothy Chamberlin, Illinois Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Wexford Health Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01054
Plaintiff:
Shelby S Williams
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, Inc., Andrew Tilden, St. James Memorial Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clemons v. Wexford Health Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00132
Plaintiff:
Rodney Clemons
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, Inc., Saleh Obasi, Arthur Funk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster et al v. Wexford Health Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv10760
Plaintiff:
Leo Foster
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, Inc., Dr. Saleh Obaisi, Dr. Latanya Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Wexford Health Services Inc et al
as 1:2016cv01410
Plaintiff:
Harley T Miller
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services Inc, Andrew Tilden, Vipin Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Sood et al
as 4:2016cv04230
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hudson
Defendant:
Kul Sood and Wexford Health Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murray v. Obaisi et al
as 1:2016cv09463
Plaintiff:
John Murray
Defendant:
Saleh Obaisi, LaTanya Williams, A. Martija and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
