Cases 61 - 70 of 77
Thornton v. Oliver
as 3:2011cv01367
Plaintiff:
William Cecil Thornton
Defendant:
Euketa Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01266
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
William Thornton v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 11-55277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM CECIL THORNTON
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary of Corrections, RICHARD HERNANDEZ, Secretary of Corrections, PICATOSTE, Jane Doe, Registered Nurse and others
Thornton v. Oliver
as 3:2011cv00338
Petitioner:
William Cecil Thornton
Respondent:
Euketa Oliver , Micheal Stainer and Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Thornton v. Strainer
as 3:2011cv00190
Petitioner:
William Cecil Thornton
Respondent:
Michael Strainer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
William Thornton v. George Neotti, et al
as 11-55108
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM CECIL THORNTON
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE A. NEOTTI, JACKSON, T. CALNAS and others
Thornton v. Cavalin et al
as 3:2011cv00108
Plaintiff:
William Cecil Thornton
Defendant:
Christine Cavalin and Jose Calderon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Thornton v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 10-56890
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILLIAM CECIL THORNTON
Defendant - Appellant:
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary of Corrections
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD HERNANDEZ, Retired Warden, PICATOSTE, Jane Doe, Registered Nurse, JOHN DOE #1, Records Manager and others
William Thornton v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 10-56867
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM CECIL THORNTON
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor of California, MATTHEW CATE, Secretary of Corrections, LEWIS, John Doe, Parole Unit Supervisor and others
William Thornton v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 10-56865
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM CECIL THORNTON
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor of California, MATTHEW CATE, Secretary of Corrections, LEWIS, John Doe, Parole Unit Supervisor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
