Cases 61 - 70 of 62,724
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Baker v. Poe
as 1:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Henry L. Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
Brian S. Poe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Darge v. Warden - Yazoo City Low
as 3:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Patrick Darge
Defendant:
Warden - Yazoo City Low
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McGhee v. Fitch
as 3:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
George Lee McGhee
Defendant:
Lynn Fitch
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Lewis v. Jackson County et al
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Armond Lewis
Defendant:
Jackson County, David Futch, Keith Miller and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sanders v. Reeves
as 3:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
George A. Sanders
Defendant:
Tate Reeves
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heavy Equipment Movers and Installation, LLC v. Calgon Carbon Corporation
as 1:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Heavy Equipment Movers and Installation, LLC
Defendant:
Calgon Carbon Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
