Cases 61 - 70 of 1,396
Turner v. M&M Limousine Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04740
Plaintiff:
Zebedee Turner
Defendant:
M&M Limousine Service, Inc., M&M Transportation Services LLC and Mindaugas Susinskas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Rubin v. Scofflaw, Inc.
as 1:2023cv04728
Plaintiff:
Kyriea Rubin
Defendant:
Scofflaw, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Ruggeri Sarigu v. Bio-Medical Applications of Illinois, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04508
Plaintiff:
Cristiana Ruggeri Sarigu
Defendant:
Bio-Medical Applications of Illinois, Inc. and Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc.
Hitchens v. Neuromonitoring Associates, LLC
as 1:2023cv04188
Plaintiff:
Mr. Rick Hitchens
Defendant:
Neuromonitoring Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Rippley v. Teamsters Local #50 et al
as 3:2023cv02173
Plaintiff:
Glenn Rippley
Defendant:
Teamsters Local #50
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
AUGUST MACK ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. v. TRESCHOW
as 1:2023cv01054
Plaintiff:
AUGUST MACK ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
Defendant:
STEVEN TRESHOW and STEVEN TRESCHOW
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Perez v. Gale Healthcare Solutions, LLC
as 1:2023cv03837
Plaintiff:
Sonia Perez and GALE HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Dored Shiba v. Alejandro Mayorkas
as 23-2304
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DORED SHIBA
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS
Thompson et al v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03717
Plaintiff:
Heaven Thompson, Christina Post and Morgan Benoit
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon.com Services, LLC and Amazon Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Wilk v. Brainshark, Inc.
as 1:2021cv04794
Plaintiff:
Lori Wilk
Defendant:
Brainshark, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
