Cases 61 - 70 of 23,215
Webber v. Georgia Department of Corrections
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Robert Webber
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
R.C. v. Broce et al
as 1:2024cv01665
Plaintiff:
R.C.
Defendant:
Candice Broce and Russel Carlson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Calhoun v. Lamb et al
as 1:2024cv01670
Plaintiff:
Sheryl Ansley Calhoun
Defendant:
Almatin Lamb, Jamal Mustafa, Gregory Tillman and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Daniels v. Aqua Midtown
as 1:2024cv01682
Plaintiff:
Joseph C. Daniels
Defendant:
Aqua Midtown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Butler v. Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2024cv01694
Plaintiff:
Randy Butler, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Human Services, Jenee Jones and Linda T. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. American Income Life et al
as 1:2024cv01709
Plaintiff:
Terrance Turner
Defendant:
American Income Life, AO Premier, American Income Life Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STAGGERS v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES
as 7:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
SHARRARD STAGGERS
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, CANDICE BROSE, VALDOSTA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0242 Deprivation of rights under color of law
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
