Cases 61 - 70 of 5,143
Ricks v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01669
Plaintiff:
Wesley Ricks
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Louisiana State Penitentiary, State of Louisiana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Ballard et al
as 3:2023cv01659
Plaintiff:
Colt A. Hicks
Defendant:
Ben Ballard, Courtney Chaney, Jennifer Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garner v. East Baton Rouge District Attorney's Office et al
as 3:2023cv01650
Plaintiff:
Demetric Rashord Garner
Defendant:
East Baton Rouge District Attorney's Office, Jason Robinson, Hillar C. Moore, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hicks v. Ballard
as 3:2023cv01654
Plaintiff:
Colt A. Hicks
Defendant:
Ben Ballard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roach v. Robicheaux
as 3:2023cv01655
Plaintiff:
Donaven D. Roach
Defendant:
Lt. Logan Robicheaux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brantley v. State of Louisiana
as 3:2023cv01644
Plaintiff:
Ca'Darius Brantley
Defendant:
State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Luke v. Hooper et al
as 3:2023cv01641
Plaintiff:
Jacob Fay Luke, Sr.
Defendant:
Tim Hooper, Unknown Russ, Jasmine Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards v. Hooper
as 3:2023cv01631
Plaintiff:
Antoine Edwards
Defendant:
Tim Hooper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walston v. Wyles et al
as 3:2023cv01595
Petitioner:
Jean Paul Walston
Respondent:
Kevin Wyles and Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Trackling v. Matthew
as 3:2023cv01593
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Trackling
Defendant:
Unknown Matthew
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
