Cases 61 - 70 of 2,615
Bonner v. Alves
as 1:2023cv11822
Plaintiff:
Omar Bonner
Defendant:
Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Silva-Prentice v. Gray
as 1:2023cv11813
Petitioner:
Robert Silva-Prentice
Respondent:
Dean Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hem v. Suffolk County House of Correction
as 1:2023cv11767
Petitioner:
Timmy Hem
Respondent:
Suffolk County House of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. Pierre-Mike et al
as 1:2023cv11665
Petitioner:
Albert Gonzalez
Respondent:
Janaya Pierre-Mike and Ricardo R. Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2023cv11660
Petitioner:
Steven L Smith
Respondent:
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Monteiro v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2023cv11609
Petitioner:
Keon Monteiro
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Madelon v. Mici
as 1:2023cv11612
Petitioner:
Yvelon Madelon
Respondent:
Carol Mici
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Turrentine v. The Collier County Jail
as 1:2023cv11439
Petitioner:
Ivan J Turrentine
Respondent:
The Collier County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cabrera Huato v. Warden, FMC Devens
as 1:2023cv11429
Petitioner:
Epifanio Cabrera Huato
Respondent:
Warden, FMC Devens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Figueroa Garcia v. Zodak
as 1:2023cv11432
Petitioner:
Werner Figueroa Garcia
Respondent:
Scott Zodak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
