Cases 61 - 70 of 6,398
Mahoney et al v. Bowers et al
as 4:2023cv40167
Plaintiff:
Brian E. Mahoney and George Curran
Defendant:
Bowers, Patricia Ruze, Dr. Hamilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muhammad v. USA DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - ALL FILINGS TO BE MADE IN CRIMINAL CASE (20-cr-10136-RGS-18)
as 1:2023cv12872
Petitioner:
Tarik Muhammad
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv12868
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Piard v. Arsenault
as 4:2023cv40165
Plaintiff:
Joseph Piard
Defendant:
Erica Arsenault
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lacedra v. USA
as 1:2023cv12855
Petitioner:
Glenn Lacedra
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Larson v. Napier
as 1:2023cv12817
Petitioner:
Thomas Larson
Respondent:
Napier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cedeno-Lora v. FMC Warden
as 1:2023cv12800
Petitioner:
Victor Cedeno-Lora
Respondent:
FMC Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harris v. Community Resources for Justice (CRJ)
as 1:2023cv12792
Plaintiff:
Patrick Harris
Defendant:
Community Resources-Justice and Community Resources for Justice (CRJ)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duarte v. Commonwealth et al
as 1:2023cv12678
Plaintiff:
Eric J Duarte
Defendant:
Commonwealth, Norfolk County, Sheriff Patrick W McDermott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duarte v. Department of Justice et al
as 1:2023cv12677
Plaintiff:
Eric J Duarte
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Sheriff Patrick W. McDermott, Superintendent Danielle Frane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
