Cases 71 - 80 of 22,851
Perez v. USA
as 1:2024cv00121
Petitioner:
Yuri Maikel Hernandez Perez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Foster v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00490
Petitioner:
Javon Santrell Foster
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mensah v. Warden Kimberly Neely
as 7:2024cv00266
Petitioner:
Deborah Mensah
Respondent:
Warden Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Curry v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv08002
Petitioner:
Ameche Lashuan Curry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Neal v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv08011
Petitioner:
John Lee Neal
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McNeal v. McClain et al
as 5:2024cv00472
Petitioner:
Jonathan Marcel McNeal
Respondent:
Antonio McClain and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brocato v. Hamm
as 7:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Ryan Anthony Brocato
Defendant:
Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moton v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv08004
Petitioner:
Christopher Moton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
King v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv08005
Petitioner:
Charles King, III
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rojas v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00415
Petitioner:
Margiee Vanessa Bonilla Rojas
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
