Cases 71 - 79 of 79
PHILLIPS v. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 1:2008cv00016
Plaintiff:
CHARLES T. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBERTO GONZALES, TROY KING and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER et al v. MERCK & CO., INC.
as 1:2007cv02288
Plaintiff:
SHERRI LYNN MILLER, LAMONT MILLER, JERRY MONROE and others
Defendant:
MERCK & CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CLARK v. NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION
as 1:2007cv01630
Plaintiff:
MARY ALICE CLARK
Defendant:
NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PEAK v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2007cv01444
Plaintiff:
ALICE PEAK
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
TWITTY v. GONZALES et al
as 1:2007cv01102
Plaintiff:
ANDRE J. TWITTY
Defendant:
ALBERTO GONZALES, ROBERT MCCOLLUM, GLENN A. FINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLS BANK INTERNATIONAL v. ALICE CORPORATION PTY. LTD.
as 1:2007cv00974
Plaintiff:
CLS BANK INTERNATIONAL
Defendant:
ALICE CORPORATION PTY. LTD.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
POWERS v. WICKLINE et al
as 1:2007cv00771
Plaintiff:
ANN POWERS
Defendant:
AD WICKLINE and ALICE WICKLINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DUMONDE v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2007cv00715
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LAFITTE DUMONDE
Defendant:
R. LANIER ANDERSON, III, MICHAEL B. BILLINGSLEY, SHARON LOVELACE BLACKBURN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
OWENS, et al v. REPUBLIC OF SUDAN, et al
as 1:2001cv02244
Plaintiff:
JAMES OWENS , GARY ROBERT OWENS , BARBARA GOFF and others
Defendant:
REPUBLIC OF SUDAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY and others
Movant:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN and ELIZABETH HOLMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602 Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
