Cases 71 - 80 of 89
Jankuski et al v. Heath Consultants, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv04549
Plaintiff:
Jason Jankuski , Brooke McKinney and Alton Morris
Defendant:
Heath Consultants, Inc., Graham Midgley and Gary Lape
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Heath v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv10697
Plaintiff:
Erin Heath
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Bayer Schering Pharma AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keck-Heath v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv12947
Plaintiff:
Stacey Keck-Heath
Defendant:
Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Bayer Schering Pharma AG, Barr Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ACE Medical US, LLC v. Heath, et al
as 1:2011cv05332
Movant:
James Heath , Kathy Lyall , Robert Guldi and others
Respondent:
ACE Medical US, LLC
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Chatman v. Pierce et al
as 1:2011cv01257
Plaintiff:
William Chatman
Defendant:
Guy Pierce, Gladyse Taylor, John Heath and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Fleener
as 2:2011cv02153
Plaintiff:
Darrin W Bennett
Defendant:
Heath Fleener
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gara v. Davis et al
as 3:2010cv00769
Plaintiff:
Rame Gara
Defendant:
Randy Davis, C/O Kelly, Tracy Peek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon et al v. Cook County et al
as 1:2009cv06976
Plaintiff:
Kevin P Dixon
Defendant:
Cook County d/b/a Cermak Heath Services, Katina M. Bonaparte, Omeke, R.N. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Heath
as 1:2009cv04783
Plaintiff:
Diane Heath
Defendant:
Unisys Corporation and Unisys Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Heath v. La Flora et al
as 1:2009cv00705
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Heath
Defendant:
Steven La Flora, Woola La Flora and Maranatha Church in God in Christ
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
