Cases 71 - 80 of 162
Hughes v. Baker
as 8:2016cv01596
Plaintiff:
Mark A Hughes
Defendant:
Rushern L. Baker, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hoang et al v. Rosen et al
as 8:2016cv01592
Plaintiff:
Minh Vu Hoang and Thanh Hoang
Defendant:
Gary A. Rosen, Roger Schlossberg, Marion A. Hecht and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hughes v. Black et al
as 1:2016cv01044
Plaintiff:
Michael B. Hughes
Defendant:
Roger Black, Blaco LLC, Woodcrest Holdings LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hughes v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 1:2016cv00806
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Hughes
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Does I through X, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gabriel v. DeVore et al
as 1:2016cv00471
Plaintiff:
Steven Gabriel
Defendant:
DeVore, Richard J. Graham, Jr., R. Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Montgomery County
as 1:2016cv00258
Petitioner:
Antonio Hugh Robinson
Respondent:
Montgomery County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Webber et al v. State of Maryland et al
as 1:2015cv03786
Plaintiff:
Paula Webber and Miah Family Foundation Trust
Defendant:
State of Maryland, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Wachovia Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CDM v. Pinckney
as 8:2015cv03514
Plaintiff:
CDM
Defendant:
Tcho-Tcho Pinckney
Thirdparty_defendant:
Hugh J. Green, James E. Clarke, Renee Dyson and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Tcho-Tcho Pinckney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Developers Surety and Indeminty Company v. Brantly Development Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv03465
Plaintiff:
Developers Surety and Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Brantly Development Group, Inc., Marshalee Woods Limited Partnership, Brantwood, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
