Cases 71 - 80 of 1,040
Erwin v. Ramos
as 6:2023cv01496
Plaintiff:
James Erwin
Defendant:
Orange County Sheriff Department and OCSO Steven Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
WRIGHT v. RAMOS
as 3:2023cv15676
Plaintiff:
MARCEL A WRIGHT
Defendant:
I RAMOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv01874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hunter v. Allison et al
as 2:2023cv14249
Plaintiff:
Jason Hunter
Defendant:
Dr. Bobbie Allison, Dr Lill Chdmarro, Annette Luhan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
RAMOS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv22028
Plaintiff:
ANDY RAMOS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
de la Cruz Ramos v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Norma de la Cruz Ramos
Defendant:
United States of America
Not Classified By Court:
Michael I. Coulson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
RAMOS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14392
Plaintiff:
MELITON RAMOS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, Aearo Holding LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ramos v Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections (Osceola County)
as 6:2023cv01342
Petitioner:
Jorge L. Ramos
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RAMOS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19136
Plaintiff:
KRIS RAMOS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
