Cases 71 - 80 of 8,672
PHAN-GILLIS v. MOUNTAIN LOAN SERVICE, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv03043
Plaintiff:
PHAN PHAN-GILLIS
Defendant:
JULIE M GROLEAU, DAVID ELBERT, GERHARD C SORENSEN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Tretter v. Fiesta Stores et al
as 4:2024cv03064
Defendant:
Mr Irving and Fiesta Stores
Plaintiff:
Wayne C. Tretter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McNeal v. McHenry et al
as 1:2024cv00942
Defendant:
S. C. McHenry and FNU Stacy
Plaintiff:
Cedric McNeal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weems v. PHH Mortgage Corporation
as 4:2024cv00764
Defendant:
PHH Mortgage Corporation
Plaintiff:
Rodger C. Weems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Lozano v. Lozano et al
as 4:2024cv03002
Plaintiff:
Juan J Lozano and Mi Rancho Mexican Grill & Bar Inc
Defendant:
El Refu Bar & Restaurant, Inc. and Daniel C Lozano
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Frankenfield v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv03062
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Brian C Frankenfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Frankenfield v. Lumpkin
as 3:2024cv00238
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Brian C Frankenfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Fisher et al
as 1:2024cv00324
Plaintiff:
Jermone E Thompson
Defendant:
FNU Paige, Latoya L Fisher and C. Onwuka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valentinis-Dee v. McMannis et al
as 1:2024cv00325
Defendant:
Brenda C Farhi, Montgomery County Jail, Montgomery County Sheriff Dept and others
Plaintiff:
James Valentinis-Dee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Relerford v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 6:2024cv00411
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Petitioner:
Lynn C. Relerford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
