Cases 71 - 80 of 466
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00265
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Coleman v. McGhee et al
as 4:2022cv00011
Plaintiff:
Joshua Coleman
Defendant:
Officer McGhee, Warden Kevin Sprayberry and Officer Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05070
Plaintiff:
Lolitalynette Coleman
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health, LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Coleman v. Carter
as 1:2021cv04720
Petitioner:
Torrey Coleman
Respondent:
Katrina Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COLEMAN v. OWENS et al
as 1:2021cv00205
Plaintiff:
KAVURI COLEMAN
Defendant:
LT MONQUES OWENS, SGT DANNIE WEST and SGT SIRBARON SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FAIR v. WHITE et al
as 5:2021cv00385
Plaintiff:
TONY ANTHONY FAIR, JR
Defendant:
HEAD NURSE WHITE, NURSE HENRY, NURSE LESTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. Cody et al
as 1:2021cv00199
Plaintiff:
KAUURI COLEMAN and KAUURI M COLEMAN
Defendant:
SGT WILLIAM CODY and DO MARQUES EALY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 4:2021cv00187
Plaintiff:
ROMELLE COLEMAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Not Classified By Court:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
COLEMAN v. SPROUL
as 1:2021cv00167
Petitioner:
KAUURI COLEMAN and KAVURI COLEMAN
Respondent:
SHERIFF KEVIN SPROUL and SHERIFF KEVIN R SPROUL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
