Cases 71 - 80 of 921
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Thibodeaux v. Daniel et al
as 3:2022cv05708
Plaintiff:
Louis James Thibodeaux
Defendant:
Paul H Daniel, James Key, A Ureno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolfelt v. Lewis County Public Works et al
as 3:2022cv05669
Defendant:
Lewis County South Airport Authority, Lewis County Public Works, Ed Carlson Memorial Field and others
Plaintiff:
Gary H Wolfelt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fraud
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2022cv05634
Plaintiff:
Harry H Williams, III and Paula Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 3:2022cv05637
Plaintiff:
Harry H Williams, III and Paula Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Williams et al v. United States of America
as 3:2022cv05640
Plaintiff:
Harry H Williams, III and Paula Williams
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Jackson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv05630
Plaintiff:
Ferrell H Jackson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Tapia v. NaphCare Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01141
Plaintiff:
Javier Tapia
Defendant:
NaphCare Inc, Pierce County, Paul Pastor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nguyen v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv01137
Petitioner:
Phuong H Nguyen
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01065
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
