Cases 71 - 80 of 95
Hugo et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp21446
Plaintiff:
Randolph R Hugo and Florence M Hugo
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Speer v. USA
as 2:2012cv00277
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Randolph H Speer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson et al v. DePuy Othopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp22695
Plaintiff:
Randolph Johnson and Revonda Johnson
Defendant:
DePuy Othopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cox et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp22156
Plaintiff:
Robert Dewitt Cox and Carol Randolph Cox
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Waters v. Calhoun et al
as 3:2011cv00754
Plaintiff:
Marian Waters
Defendant:
Jamel Calhoun, Walter Randolph, Medicare and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Williams v. Timmerman-Cooper et al
as 2:2010cv00375
Plaintiff:
Randolph Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Deb Timmerman-Cooper, Hurwood, Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Youngblood v. Brown et al
as 3:2010cv00540
Plaintiff:
Antone Youngblood
Defendant:
Brian Brown, Adam Warmath, Larry Gilchrist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Randolph v. Holzer Medical Center et al
as 2:2010cv00126
Plaintiff:
Paul C Randolph
Defendant:
Holzer Medical Center, Holzer Clinic Inc, Holzer Consolidated Health Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
