Cases 71 - 77 of 77
Northern Arapaho Tribe v. Purdue Pharma LP et al
as 1:2018op45438
Plaintiff:
Northern Arapaho Tribe
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc., Purdue Frederick Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45432
Defendant:
Amerisourcebergen Corp., McKesson Corporation, Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Local Union No. 120 Pipe Fitters Insurance Fund and Cleveland Bakers and Teamsters Health and Welfare Fund
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
County of Summit, Ohio et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018op45090
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma L.P., Jane Does 1-50 and others
Plaintiff:
Valley Fire District, City of Norton, Ohio, Village of Boston Heights, Ohio and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Walgreen Co.
3Rd Party Defendant:
John and Jane Does
Interested Party:
State of Ohio Board of Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
City of Huntington v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2017op45054
Plaintiff:
City of Huntington
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Manning v. Wyeth LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00087
Plaintiff:
Patricia A Manning
Defendant:
Wyeth LLC , Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc , Pfizer Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sturdivan v. Actavis Elizabeth, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00133
Plaintiff:
Reda Sturdivan
Defendant:
Actavis Elizabeth, LLC, Mylan, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Marcum v. Actavis Group hf, et. al.
as 3:2008cv00276
Plaintiff:
Sandra J Marcum
Defendant:
Actavis Group hf, Actavis Totowa, LLC, Actavis, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
