Cases 71 - 80 of 180
Federal Trade Commission v. AWS et al
as 2:2018mc00257
Receiver:
Robb Evans & Associates
Defendant:
Online Aution Learning Center-Nevada, FBA Distributors, FBA Stores and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Snap Advances v. SHG of Illinois et al
as 2:2018cv00016
Plaintiff:
Snap Advances
Defendant:
SHG of Illinois , Martin Adams and Brian S. Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Molling v. McArthur et al
as 1:2017cv00189
Plaintiff:
Adam Molling
Defendant:
Robert G. McArthur and RGM Design
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Adams v. Diamond et al
as 2:2017cv01189
Plaintiff:
Ian Adams
Defendant:
Douglas Diamond and West Jordan City
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kinder et al v. State of Colorado et al
as 2:2017cv01007
Plaintiff:
Ruben W Kinder and Patrick Quinteros
Defendant:
State of Colorado, John Hickenlooper, Gordon P. Gallagher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coldwater Capital et al v. Harline et al
as 2:2017cv00885
Plaintiff:
Coldwater Capital , Jared Richards and Adam Hepworth
Defendant:
Greg Harline and Zach Backes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jones v. Summit County et al
as 2:2017cv00815
Plaintiff:
Adam Jones
Defendant:
Summit County , David Edmunds and Kamas City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Parker et al v. Monavie Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00764
Plaintiff:
Adam Parker and Andrew Harbut
Defendant:
Monavie Inc and Monavie LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evergreen Ranch v. Perdue et al
as 2:2017cv00478
Plaintiff:
Evergreen Ranch
Defendant:
George Erving Perdue , United States Department of Agriculture , LuAnn Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hunter v. HCA et al
as 1:2017cv00060
Plaintiff:
Edward G. Hunter
Defendant:
HCA , Mountainstar Health , Columbia Ogden Regional Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
