Cases 71 - 80 of 1,758
Resch v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2013cv08977
Plaintiff:
John Resch
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company, A.O. Smith Corporation, Asbestos Corporation Ltd. and others
Cross_claimant:
Union Carbide Corporation
Cross_defendant:
Union Carbide Corporation, 84 Lumber Company, A.O. Smith Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Byers et al v. Ameren Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv01299
Plaintiff:
Larry Byers and Delberta Byers
Defendant:
Ameren Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc., Asbestos Corporation LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Genusa v. Asbestos Corporation Ltd., et al
as 3:2013cv00794
Defendant:
Asbestos Corporation, Ltd., Baton Rouge Marine Contractors, Frank Beason, Jr. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Baton Rouge Marine Contractors, Baton Rouge Marine Contractors, Inc and Baton Rouge Marine Contractors, Inc
Plaintiff:
Louis Genusa, Jr.
ThirdParty Defendant:
International Longshoremen's Association, AFL-CIO, International Longshoremen's Association, AFL-CIO, Local 3033, ILA, AFL-CIO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Baldwin v. Ace Hardware Corporation et al
as 1:2013cv01986
Plaintiff:
Paula Baldwin
Defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. , Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Bird Inc.
Cross_defendant:
Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. , Arvinmeritor Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Oakfabco Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Oakfabco Inc. , Ace Hardware Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
BRAZELTON v. GOODRICH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv60002
Counter Defendant:
THE MARMON GROUP, INC., BUFFALO PUMPS, INC., AMERICAN STANDARD, INC. and others
Cross Defendant:
ROCKBESTOS COMPANY, THEIM CORPORATION, ILLINOIS TOOL WORKS, INC. and others
Defendant:
MCNEIL & NRM INC., ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC., GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY and others
Cross Claimant:
GEORGE V. HAMILTON, INC. and ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Plaintiff:
BERNICE BRAZELTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Tallman v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 1:2013cv01828
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Tallman
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company , Ace Hardware Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Genuine Parts Company , IMO Industries Inc. , SB Decking Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Genuine Parts Company , 84 Lumber Company , Ace Hardware Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Fanelli v. Asbestos Corporation LTD. et al
as 3:2013cv01035
Plaintiff:
William Fanelli
Defendant:
Asbestos Corporation LTD., Atwood & Morrill Company, Inc., Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. , Trane US, Inc. and Ingersoll-Rand Company
Cross_defendant:
Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. , Asbestos Corporation LTD., Atwood & Morrill Company, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant:
Imo Industries, Inc. , Certainteed Corporation and RSCC Wire & Cable LLC
Counter_defendant:
Imo Industries, Inc. , Asbestos Corporation LTD., Atwood & Morrill Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Schwindt et al v. A.B.B., Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00996
Plaintiff:
Arnold Schwindt and Maritza Schwindt
Defendant:
A.B.B., Inc. , ABB Inc. , Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc and others
Cross_claimant:
Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. , York International Corporation , A.B.B., Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
Borgwarner Morse Tec, Inc. , A.B.B., Inc. , ABB Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Jose Ortiz et al v. Armstrong International, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv06550
Defendant:
Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc., Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Ortiz and Pauline Ortiz
Jose Ortiz et al v. Armstrong International, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv06541
Defendant:
Armstrong International, Inc., Asbestos Corporation, Ltd., BW IP International, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Ortiz and Pauline Ortiz
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
