Cases filed in District of Columbia
Cases 71 - 78 of 78
POINTER et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00247
Plaintiff: BRUCE A. POINTER, SR. and PIERRETTE M. POINTER
Defendant: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and GEORGE L. BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
PENDERGRAST v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,et al
as 1:2008cv00234
Plaintiff: ANNETTE PENDERGRAST
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and JAMES LEROY BRYANT, SR.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
WEEMS v. STEPHENS et al
as 1:2007cv01140
Plaintiff: TONY WEEMS
Defendant: JAY B. STEPHENS, WANDA BRYANT, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv01031
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
BRYANT et al v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
as 1:2007cv00648
Plaintiff: ERIC BRYANT and JOAN BRYANT
Defendant: UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 Civil Actions by Taxpayers for Refund of Taxes
RIVERA v. U. S. SECRETARY OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2007cv00525
Plaintiff: VINCENT FAUSTINO RIVERA
Defendant: BOB GATES, GEORGE BUSH, RICHARD B. CHENEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOVE et al v. VENEMAN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2000cv02502
Plaintiff: ROSEMARY LOVE , LIND MARIE BARA-WEAVER , MARGARET ODOM and others
Defendant: TOM J. VILSACK
Movant: BARBARA E, ADAMS , CHRISTINE BRAYBOY ANDERSON , GLADYS SCOTT ANDERSON and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:1999cv02979
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?