Cases 71 - 80 of 240
Wooten v. Sollie et al
as 3:2020cv00044
Defendant:
Cynthia Porter, K. Sellers, Casey Spears and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Charles Wooten
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murshid v. Sollie
as 3:2019cv00935
Plaintiff:
Abdulkhalig Mohamed Murshid
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Billie Sollie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Field v. Sollie
as 3:2019cv00922
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Christian D. Field
Respondent:
Billy Sollie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Field v. Sollie et al
as 3:2019cv00901
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Sheriff Billy Sollie, Mellissa McCarter and Daphnee Bar
Plaintiff:
Christian David-Koenig Field
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wooten v. Sollie
as 3:2019cv00884
Plaintiff:
Marcus Charles Wooten
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Billy Sollie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. Sollie et al
as 3:2019cv00861
Petitioner:
Jarrett Romero Nelson
Respondent:
Medical Staff of LCDF, Melissa McCarter, Thomas Vann and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hill v. Sollie et al
as 3:2019cv00823
Plaintiff:
Shamell Antwane Hill
Defendant:
Major Melissa McCarter and Sheriff Billie Sollie
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Sollie et al
as 3:2019cv00812
Defendant:
Lauderdale County Mississippi, Meridian Police Department, Billy Sollie and others
Plaintiff:
Onorious Campbell
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Sollie
as 3:2019cv00811
Respondent:
Sheriff Billy Sollie
Petitioner:
Shamell Antwane Hill
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nelson v. Sollie et al
as 3:2019cv00796
Defendant:
Medical Staff of LCDF, Billy Sollie, Melissa McCarter and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Jarrett Romero Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
