Cases 71 - 80 of 265
Anthony Tillman v. Board of Prison Term
as 11-16534
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY BRYANT TILLMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BOARD OF PRISON TERMS
Case v. Board of Prison Terms et.al.
as 5:2011cv03042
Petitioner:
James T. Case
Defendant:
Board of Prison Terms, Jerry Brown and Nancy Hardy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricardo M Gaxiola v. Board of Prison Term et al
as 2:2011cv04530
Respondent:
Board of Prison Term and J Tim Ochoa
Petitioner:
Ricardo M Gaxiola
Smith v. Sacramento Board of Prison Terms
as 2:2011cv01304
Defendant:
Sacramento Board of Prison Terms
Plaintiff:
Kenneth A. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Downs v. California Board of Prison, et al
as 11-55777
Petitioner - Appellant:
GREGORY DOWNS
Respondent - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA BOARD OF PRISON TERMS II and DOMINGO URIBE, Jr., Warden
Michael Foote v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 11-15933
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL D. FOOTE
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW CATE, Secretary of CDCR, KATHLEEN DICKINSON, Warden and CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY RELEASE BOARD, FKA Board of Prison Terms
Clarence Cleveland v. Margarita Perez, et al
as 11-55603
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLARENCE F. CLEVELAND
Respondent - Appellee:
MARGARITA E. PEREZ, Chairwoman, Board of Prison Terms for California, JEAN WOODFORD, Director, California Department of Corrections and A. P. KANE, Correctional Training Facility
Higueret v. Brown et al
as 5:2011cv01681
Plaintiff:
Steven Higueret
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Director of Department of Corrections and Board Of Prison Term
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tillman v. Board of Prison Terms
as 2:2011cv00816
Petitioner:
Anthony B. Tillman
Respondent:
Board of Prison Terms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Scott v. Sacramento Superior Court et al
as 2:2011cv00756
Petitioner:
Mark Scott
Respondent:
Sacramento Superior Court, Board of Prison Terms, Sacramento County Sheriff's and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
