Cases 71 - 80 of 91
Lexon Insurance Company v. A. Bonamase Contracting
as 4:2011cv00318
Plaintiff:
Lexon Insurance Company and Bond Safeguard Insurance Company
Defendant:
A. Bonamase Contracting, Inc., Christine Bonamase and Scott Bonamase
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Bond v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp20114
Plaintiff:
Edward J. Bond
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Depuy, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00441
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
United States of America v. Moore et al
as 2:2010cv00285
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
William J. Moore, Julia Meade Rupp, Chase Manhattan Mortgage and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6502 IRS:Enforcement of tax liens
Moton, Sr. et al v. Richland County Probate Court
as 1:2010cv00419
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Moton, Sr. and Julia F. Bond
Defendant:
Richland County Probate Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bey et al v. Grosteffon et al
as 3:2010cv00161
Plaintiff:
Aayan Naim Bey and Calvin Bell
Defendant:
Tim Grosteffon and 24/7 Bail Bonds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Holley v. DRS Bonded Collection Systems
as 1:2009cv00686
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Holley
Defendant:
DRS Bonded Collection Systems
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
