Cases 71 - 80 of 229
Brooks v. Broomfield et al
as 3:2022cv04088
Plaintiff:
Steven D. Brooks
Defendant:
Warden Ron Broomfield, Ron Davis, Ralph Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Khalifah ED Saif'ullah v.Ron Broomfield
as 2:2022cv04521
Petitioner:
Khalifah ED Saif ullah
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Rosalez et al
as 4:2022cv04091
Plaintiff:
Paul David Johnson
Defendant:
R. Rosalez, Sergeant A. Cuevas, S. Stribling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kramer v. Peres et al
as 3:2022cv03803
Plaintiff:
Andrew Kramer
Defendant:
Doctor Peres, Warden Ron Broomfield and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcus Columbus Eugene v. Ron Broomfield
as 2:2022cv03844
Plaintiff:
Marcus Columbus Eugene
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reed v. Broomfield et al
as 2:2022at00706
Petitioner:
Monte Antonio Reed
Respondent:
Warden Ron Broomfield and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ulep v. Allison et al
as 4:2022cv02617
Plaintiff:
Alex Ulep
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Ralph Diaz, Ronald Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carpenter v. Nelson et al
as 5:2022cv02086
Plaintiff:
Jerome Carpenter
Defendant:
D. Nelson and Warden Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldberg v. Broomfield
as 3:2022cv02273
Petitioner:
Jon Goldberg
Respondent:
Warden Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dixon v. Diaz et al
as 4:2022cv02322
Plaintiff:
Gregory J. Dixon
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, DIrector CDCR Kathleen Allison, Warden Ron Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
