Cases 71 - 80 of 1,057
CARPENTER v. SCHENCK
as 3:2022cv01928
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. CARPENTER
Defendant:
HUNTER BRYCE SCHENCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
CARPENTER v. HARTMAN
as 3:2022cv01925
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. CARPENTER
Defendant:
JACK M. HARTMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARPENTER v. BURKE
as 3:2022cv01930
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. CARPENTER
Defendant:
KEVIN G. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
CARPENTER v. SMITH
as 3:2022cv01929
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. CARPENTER
Defendant:
SUZANNE SENNETT SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
EASTERN ATLANTIC STATES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, UBCJA v. RICHIE JORDAN CONSTRUCTION INC.
as 3:2022cv01777
Petitioner:
EASTERN ATLANTIC STATES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, UBCJA
Respondent:
RICHIE JORDAN CONSTRUCTION INC.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
CARPENTER v. HOHENADEL et al
as 3:2022cv01719
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. CARPENTER
Defendant:
JOHN P. HOHENADEL and NIKOLAS & HOHENADEL, LLP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CARPENTER v. GRAB et al
as 3:2022cv01722
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. CARPENTER
Defendant:
MICHAEL STEVEN GRAB and NIKOLAUS & HOHENADEL, LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
CARPENTER v. ESTATE OF DONALD HERBERT NIKOLAUS et al
as 3:2022cv01727
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. CARPENTER
Defendant:
ESTATE OF DONALD HERBERT NIKOLAUS and NIKOLAUS & HOHENADEL LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
EASTERN ATLANTIC STATES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, UBCJA v. CMS CONSTRUCTION, INC
as 2:2022cv01615
Petitioner:
EASTERN ATLANTIC STATES REGIONAL COUNCIL OF CARPENTERS, UBCJA
Respondent:
CMS CONSTRUCTION, INC
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
CARPENTER v. DONEGAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2022cv01467
Plaintiff:
DAVID B. CARPENTER
Defendant:
DONEGAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
