Cases 71 - 80 of 90
Rapozo v. Lingle et al
as 2:2008cv01310
Plaintiff:
Richard B. Rapozo
Defendant:
Linda Lingle, Clayton Frank, Tommy Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Anthony Regan v. Department of Public Safety, et al
as 08-16042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY REGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, State of Hawaii, EDWIN SHIMODA, ALLAN ASATO and others
Anthony Regan v. State of Hawaii Department of, et al
as 08-15868
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY REGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY, John Doe Individuals of the Department of Public Safety and CLAYTON FRANK
Paul Campos v. Linda Lingle, et al
as 08-15575
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL LANAKILA CAMPOS
Defendant - Appellee:
LINDA LINGLE, CLAYTON FRANK, KAY BOWMAN and others
McCabe v. McComber et al
as 1:2008cv00112
Plaintiff:
Alan M. McCabe
Defendant:
Monte McComber, Hanford Hoomana, Francis Sequiera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jelks v. Thomas et al
as 1:2008cv00108
Petitioner:
Kenneth Jelks
Respondent:
Swenson and Clayton Frank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Won v. Frank, et al.
as 1:2008cv00090
Plaintiff:
Aaron K.F. Won
Defendant:
Clayton Frank, Eric Tanaka, Richard Condon and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Murauskas v. Swenson et al
as 2:2008cv00200
Plaintiff:
Keith Murauskas
Defendant:
Swenson, Linda Lingle, John Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jin Kwak v. Frank
as 1:2007cv00534
Petitioner:
Tony Jin Kwak
Respondent:
Clayton Frank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alden v. Frank et al
as 1:2007cv00469
Plaintiff:
Pauline Alden
Defendant:
Clayton Frank, May Andrade, Eric Tanaka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
