Cases filed in Connecticut
Cases 71 - 80 of 86
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01481
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Constas v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00032
Plaintiff: Harry T. Constas
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA and FDIC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Paltauf v. Kanowitz et al
as 3:2010cv01001
Plaintiff: Robert Paltauf
Defendant: Edward Kanowitz, Pamela Cianci and JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: Default by Promissary Note
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00888
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00817
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Caires v. JP Morgan Chase Bank We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv02142
Plaintiff: Richard Caires
Defendant: JP Morgan Chase Bank and JP Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv02080
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Harleysville Ins Co v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
as 3:2009cv01858
Plaintiff: Harleysville Ins Co
Defendant: JP Morgan Chase Bank and JP Morgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Type: Other Statutes None
MacPherson v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv01774
Plaintiff: Sean MacPherson
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA and JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01469
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type: Other Statutes None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?