Cases 71 - 80 of 113
Germonto v. Utah Legislature, The et al
as 2:2012cv00208
Plaintiff:
Frederick Germonto
Defendant:
Utah Legislature, The, Gary R. Herbert, Utah Board of Pardons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evanko v. WCDI et al
as 2:2012cv00178
Defendant:
Anthony Petzitillo, WCDI, The Estate Of Ron Piccolo and others
Plaintiff:
John Evanko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Germonto v. Board of Pardons et al
as 2:2012cv00156
Petitioner:
Frederick Germonto
Respondent:
Board of Pardons, FNU Bigalow, Clark Harms and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
24 Hour Fitness USA v. Curtis
as 2:2011mc01133
Petitioner:
24 Hour Fitness USA
Respondent:
Anthony Curtis
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Brimley v. ReconTrust et al
as 2:2011cv00737
Plaintiff:
Curtis Brimley
Defendant:
ReconTrust , Deutsche Bank National Trust , Meridias Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ambuehl et al v. Aames Funding et al
as 2:2011cv00693
Plaintiff:
John Ambuehl , Mara Ambuehl , Oliver Bigler and others
Defendant:
Aames Funding, Aegis Wholesale, American Home Mortgage Acceptance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Livingston et al v. York et al
as 2:2011cv00674
Plaintiff:
Dale Livingston and Fred Brunsvik
Defendant:
Louise York, Ted Stewart, Lindsey LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Niebuhr et al
as 2:2011cv00672
Plaintiff:
Willie C. Moore
Defendant:
Daniel A. Niebuhr and Tracy Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cricket Communications v. All You Can Talk Partners et al
as 2:2011cv00315
Petitioner:
Cricket Communications
Respondent:
All You Can Talk Partners and William H. Curtis
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
Jadama v. Chairy et al
as 2:2011cv00166
Plaintiff:
Adama Jadama
Defendant:
Mariah Chairy, Sean Carter, Marshall Matter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
