Cases 71 - 80 of 302
Diles v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 9:2020cv00814
Petitioner:
Barrington Diles
Respondent:
Northeast Bureau of Prisons, J. Ray Ormond and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cotto v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2020cv03011
Defendant:
N. Reid, USDOJ/FBOP, Rivera and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Cotto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Laurence v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2020cv00072
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
Thomas Barret Laurence
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lisi v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2019cv07317
Plaintiff:
Brandon Lisi
Defendant:
Jane Doe #1 - #10, Department of Justice, XYZ Entities #1 - #10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The New York Times Company v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2020cv00833
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Plaintiff:
The New York Times Company
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Geritano v. AUSA Office for The E.D.N.Y. et al
as 1:2020cv00781
Defendant:
The Federal Bureau of Prisons, The Metropolitan Correctional Center, AUSA Lindsay K Gerdes, Esq. and others
Plaintiff:
Battista Geritano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv10586
Defendant:
Warden Blankensee, HSA Bryan Walls, Alfonso Linley and others
Plaintiff:
Darrell Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
as 1:2019cv08831
Petitioner:
Joe N. Flowers
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Grossman v. United States of America et al
as 7:2019cv09191
Defendant:
Officer Ahamad Rezak, J.L. Maldonado, Ahmed Rezak and others
Plaintiff:
Yitz Grossman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 bb
Flowers v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
as 1:2019cv09417
Petitioner:
Joe N. Flowers
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
