Cases 71 - 80 of 9,594
Bango, Noel K. v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 9:2024cv80315
Plaintiff:
Noel K. Bango
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crespo, Dennis G. v. McHenry et al
as 1:2024cv21015
Plaintiff:
Dennis George Crespo
Defendant:
McHenry, Huey, Sergeant Rowe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Romero, Addy A. v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 4:2024cv10025
Plaintiff:
Addy Alejandro Romero
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
VOSBURG v. JOHNSON et al
as 5:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RG VOSBURG
Defendant:
JOHNSON, PERKINS and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eli Malave v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10746
Petitioner:
ELI LONG MALAVE
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Hale Harris v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10767
Petitioner:
HALE R. HARRIS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Zachary Littleton v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10750
Petitioner:
ZACHARY ANTWANN LITTLETON
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Isaac Louiniste v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10768
Petitioner:
ISAAC RALDY LOUINISTE
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Martinez, Diego C. v. Leslie et al
as 1:2024cv20966
Plaintiff:
Diego C. Martinez
Defendant:
Zakary Leslie and Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Vadol Reed and Vadol M. Reed
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections and C. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
