Cases 71 - 80 of 110
Gold Value International Textile, Inc. v. Forever 21, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv03663
Defendant:
Does, Forever 21 Retail, Inc. and Forever 21, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gold Value International Textile, Inc.
United Fabrics International, Inc. v. Forever 21, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv02540
Defendant:
Charlotte Russe Holding, Inc., Does, Eastlion Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
United Fabrics International, Inc.
Varksy v. Forever 21, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00745
Defendant:
Forever 21 Retail, Inc. and Forever 21, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Laura Varksy
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Cortes-Reyes v. Forever 21 Retail, Inc.
as 3:2010cv02032
Plaintiff:
Raul Cortes-Reyes
Defendant:
Forever 21 Retail, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amram et al v. Forever 21 Retail, Inc.
as 1:2010cv23782
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Amram and Isaac Amram
Defendant:
Forever 21 Retail, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Express, LLC v. Forever 21, Inc., et al
as 10-56554
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EXPRESS, LLC
Defendant - Appellee:
FOREVER 21, INC., FOREVER 21 LOGISTICS, LLC, FOREVER 21 RETAIL, INC. and others
Brown v. Forever 21 Retail, Inc.
as 1:2010cv03761
Plaintiff:
Christopher E. Brown
Defendant:
Forever 21 Retail, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00081
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Turner v. Forever 21, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv00762
Plaintiff:
Katie Caroline Turner and Katie Caroline Turner
Defendant:
Forever 21, Inc., Forever 21 Retail, Inc., Forever 21 Logistics, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Azael Dythian Perales v. Forever 21 Retail Inc.
as 2:2009cv06876
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant:
Forever 21 Retail Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
