Cases 71 - 80 of 243
Gill v. USA
as 1:2019cv02897
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Brian Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re Jumia Technologies AG Securities Litigation
as 1:2019cv04397
Defendant:
Sacha Poignonnec, Antoine Malliet-Mezeray, Jumia Technologies AG and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Strugala, Yifeng Zhu and Matthew Sacks
Petitioner:
Kalyanasundaram Venkataraman, Donna Jones, Hongtao Qiu and others
Lead Plaintiff:
Hexuan Cai
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Lou Zhi
Kaikov v. Kaikov et al
as 1:2019cv02521
Defendant:
SHIRYAK, BOWMAN, ANDERSON, GILL & KADOCHNIKOV LLP, ROYAL A&K REALTY GROUP INC., AG REALTY BRONX CORP. and others
Plaintiff:
CHALAMO KAIKOV
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Gill v. Moody Mart 2 Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02171
Defendant:
Hill Enterprise Inc., Moody Mart 2 Inc., Tariq Mahmud and others
Plaintiff:
Danish Gill
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jackson v. Mostofksy et al
as 1:2019cv00699
Defendant:
Hon. Steven Z. Mostofksy, Dr. Gill and Langone Hospital Brooklyn NY
Plaintiff:
Henry Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jackson v. Mostofksy et al
as 1:2019cv00750
Defendant:
Dr. Gill, Honor Steven Z. Motofsky, Langone Hospital Brooklyn NY and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gill v. Booker et al
as 1:2019cv00142
Defendant:
1-10 John/Jane Does (s), P.O.M. Santiago, Sgt. Zaing and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv07450
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv07450
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Achong et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv12144
Plaintiff:
Rona Smith, Richard Nagle, Shquan Mais-Williams and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
