Cases 71 - 80 of 86
Lerajjareanra-O-Kel-ly v. Zmuda et al
as 1:2010cv00263
Plaintiff:
Lerajjareanra-O-Kel-ly
Defendant:
Jefferey D Zmuda, Brent Reinke, Pam Sonnen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Provident Royalties LLC et al
as 1:2009mc06768
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Provident Royalties LLC, Provident Asset Management LLC, Provident Energy 1 LP and others
Lerajjareanra-O-Kel-ly v. Johnson et al
as 1:2009cv00645
Plaintiff:
- Lerajjareanra-O-Kel-ly
Defendant:
Michael Johnson, A DeWayne Shedd, Jeff Eastman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Solis v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv00616
Plaintiff:
Luis Solis, Jr
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, Correctional Medical Services, Mark Gemlich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Watts et al
as 1:2009cv00442
Plaintiff:
Helen O. Freeman
Defendant:
Dan L Watts, Gennady Babichenko and Henry Babichenko
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Dunlap v. Henry
as 1:2009cv00138
Plaintiff:
Timothy Allan Dunlap
Defendant:
Jeff Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Makowitz v. State of Idaho
as 4:2009cv00092
Plaintiff:
Henry Makowitz
Defendant:
State of Idaho
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Payne et al v. Sandy et al
as 4:2009cv00089
Plaintiff:
Albert Payne and Shirley Noble
Defendant:
Robyn Sandy, Caroline Meline, Jay L Nielson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hunt v. Boomer et al
as 1:2009cv00049
Plaintiff:
Richard H Hunt
Defendant:
Henry Boomer and Mathew Williams
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Imperial Capital Bank et al v. Dean
as 1:2008cv00510
Plaintiff:
Imperial Capital Bank and Imperial Capital Bank
Defendant:
Henry Dean, Linda L. Badell and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
