Cases 71 - 78 of 78
Neuharth v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv05267
Plaintiff:
Heidi Neuharth
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2008cv05007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Credit Suisse Financial Corporation et al v. Parish Marketing & Development et al
as 0:2008cv01038
Plaintiff:
Credit Suisse Financial Corporation, Credit Suisse Financial Corporation, DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc and others
Defendant:
Parish Marketing & Development, Michael Alan Parish, Ardith Ann Parish and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2008cv00296
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2007cv04917
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Poepsel v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide Inc.
as 0:2007cv03442
Plaintiff:
Heidi Poepsel, Heidi Poepsel and Heidi Poepsel
Defendant:
C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Lejchar et al v. Puro et al
as 0:2007cv01064
Plaintiff:
Gerald A. Lejchar, Gerald A. Lejchar, Mary Kay Lejchar and others
Defendant:
Barbe L. Puro, Barbe L. Puro, Malmberg Development Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2007cv01079
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
