Cases 71 - 80 of 272
Gaston v. Maywood Police Schleich et al
as 1:2018cv05958
Defendant:
John Doe, Sgt Greenleaf, Jim Lynch and others
Plaintiff:
Herbert Gaston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spire STL Pipeline LLC v. Turman et al
as 3:2018cv01502
Defendant:
Connie Sout, Jacob D. Cronin, The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis and others
Plaintiff:
Spire STL Pipeline LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Khan et al v. Hemosphere Inc., et al
as 1:2018cv05368
Plaintiff:
Iftikhar Khan and Nazir Khan
Defendant:
Hemosphere Inc., James D. Lawson, F. Noel Parent and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Thornton v. Kallis
as 1:2018cv01256
Petitioner:
Herbert Thornton
Respondent:
Steven Kallis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Aguilar v. Goldberg et al
as 1:2018cv04218
Plaintiff:
Armando Martinez Aguilar
Defendant:
Herbert Louis Goldberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cone v. Actavis, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03684
Plaintiff:
Herbert Cone
Defendant:
Actavis, Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc. and Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Sundquist v. Wilson et al
as 1:2018cv03598
Defendant:
Mary Alice W. Taylor, Michael L. Eskew, Siddharth N. Mehta and others
Plaintiff:
Denise Sundquist and Kimberly Petersen
Petitioner:
Norma Mims
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2018cv02188
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Sean Simmons, Gravador Charlotte and others
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Needom v. Cook County Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv01734
Defendant:
Cook County Dept. of Corrections and Service List
Plaintiff:
Herbert Andre Needom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Lashbrook et al
as 1:2018cv01343
Petitioner:
Herbert Morris
Respondent:
Jacquelen Lashbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
