Cases 71 - 80 of 95
Parrish-Parrado v. United States of America
as 5:2010cv03157
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Parrish-Parrado
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Parrish v. Legal Services for Prisoners of Kansas, Inc.
as 5:2010cv03143
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Parrish
Defendant:
Legal Services for Prisoners of Kansas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parrish v. Fernando
as 5:2010cv03130
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Parrish
Defendant:
John Fernando
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parrish v. Hutchinson Correctional Facility
as 5:2010cv03129
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Parrish
Defendant:
Hutchinson Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parrish v. Thompson
as 5:2010cv03125
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Parrish
Defendant:
Ryan Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parrish-Parrado v. Rohling et al
as 5:2010cv03117
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Parrish-Parrado
Defendant:
Karen S. Rohling, Kansas, State of, Kansas Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parrish v. Garrett, et al
as 10-3091
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL JOSEPH PARRISH
Defendant - Appellee:
MARQUIS GARRETT, Inmate, Larned Correctional Facility, SHELLEY LAURENT, Captain on Duty, Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility, WILLIAM H. BAIR, Captain, Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility and others
Parrish v. Garrett et al
as 5:2010cv03051
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Parrish
Defendant:
Marquis Garrett, Shelley Laurent, William H. Bair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parrish-Parrado v. Boswell
as 5:2010cv03021
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Parrish-Parrado
Defendant:
Roger Boswell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parrish-Parrado v. Rohling et al
as 5:2010cv03019
Plaintiff:
Daniel Joseph Parrish-Parrado
Defendant:
Karen S. Rohling and Larned Correctional Mental Health Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
