Cases 71 - 80 of 157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv05278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
VERIFY SMART CORP. v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 2:2016cv04853
Plaintiff:
VERIFY SMART CORP.
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
PODOLSKY et al v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 3:2016cv04072
Plaintiff:
YEHUDIS PODOLSKY and SIMCHA PODOLSKY
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PURPURA v. JP MORGAN CHASE et al
as 2:2016cv03765
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS E. PURPURA
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE , JAMES DIMON , DEAN COOPER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
JAMES B. NUTTER AND COMPANY v. KENNEDY et al
as 2:2016cv02658
Plaintiff:
JAMES B. NUTTER AND COMPANY
Defendant:
MELVENE L. KENNEDY, KENNEDY, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
INTERPOOL, INC. v. AYESH et al
as 3:2016cv02490
Plaintiff:
INTERPOOL, INC.
Defendant:
AYEAH A. AYESH, FOUR HORSEMEN INC. and A & A EXP, INC.
Garnishee:
AV LOGISTICS LLC, CHAMPION LOGISTICS, INC. and JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KHANNA et al
as 3:2016cv02458
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SUNIL KHANNA, POONAM KHANNA, KHANNA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
SCHWARTZ v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
as 3:2016cv02198
Plaintiff:
BARRY SCHWARTZ
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
HEINE et al v. DIRECTOR OF CODES AND STANDARDS et al
as 2:2015cv08210
Plaintiff:
ELLEN HEINE, CHRISTOPHER GRIECO, KARA GRIECO and others
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OF CODES AND STANDARDS, BUREAU CHIEF, DIVISION OF FIRE AND SAFETY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
